Danaher Motion Nextstep, Drive Microstepping Single Axis 120V. Danaher Motion Nextstep, Drive Microstepping Single Axis 120V/7.9AMP. New - Factory Sealed. Connect with IMS engineers who will repair your broken or damaged DANAHER MOTION NEXTSTEP, DRIVE MICROSTEPPING SINGLE AXIS 120V. Contact us today for details.
Price refinements - CarouselShowing slide {CURRENT_SLIDE} of {TOTAL_SLIDES} - Price refinements
Drive Lres Microstepping Nextstep Idc Corporation Industrial Devices Idc Nextstep Lres Microstepping Drive Industrial Devices Corporation $145.00 Nextstep Tm Tm L. Object-oriented G Applications By Programming Nextstep Simson One Step. P5000 Stepper Drive. The P5000 is a compact micro-stepping stepper drive optimized for high system performance with Kollmorgenâs industry leading POWERMAX II stepper motors. It is an impressive yet simple addition to the Kollmorgen stepper drive family. MSD415 Microstepping Drive Datasheet V3.0 Motion Control Products Ltd., 11-15 Francis Ave. Bournemouth, UK BH11 8NX Tel.: +44 (0)1202 599922 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.motioncontrolproducts.com Page: 1/5.
Stepper motors divide a full rotation into hundreds of discrete steps, which makes them ideal to precisely control movements, be it in cars, robots, 3D printers or CNC machines. Most stepper motors youâll encounter in DIY projects, 3D printers, and small CNC machines are bi-polar, 2-phase hybrid stepper motors, either with 200 or â in the high-res variant â with 400 steps per revolution. This results in a step angle of 1.8 °, respectively 0.9 °.
In a way, steps are the pixels of motion, and oftentimes, the given, physical resolution isnât enough. Hard-switching a stepper motorâs coils in full-step mode (wave-drive) causes the motor to jump from one step position to the next, resulting in overshoot, torque ripple, and vibrations. Also, we want to increase the resolution of a stepper motor for more accurate positioning. Modern stepper motor drivers feature microstepping, a driving technique that squeezes arbitrary numbers of microsteps into every single full-step of a stepper motor, which noticeably reduces vibrations and (supposedly) increases the stepper motorâs resolution and accuracy.
On the one hand, microsteps are really steps that a stepper motor can physically execute, even under load. On the other hand, they usually donât add to the stepper motorâs positioning accuracy. Microstepping is bound to cause confusion. This article is dedicated to clearing that up a bit and â since itâs a very driver dependent matter â Iâll also compare the microstepping capabilities of the commonly used A4988, DRV8825 and TB6560AHQ motor drivers.
Idc Next Step Microstepping Drive ManualMicrostepping
In a hybrid stepper motor, a microstepping-enabled motor driver will adjust the current in the stator coils to position the permanent magnet rotor in an intermediate position between two subsequent full-steps. A full-step is then divided into a number of microsteps, and each microstep is achieved by the two coil currents.
Many older industrial motor drivers feature only 4 microsteps (quarter-step mode), but today, 16, 32 and even 256 microsteps per full-step are commonly found. If we had a 200 steps per revolution stepper motor before, we now have a 51,200 steps per revolution miracle. In theory. Api 1104 21st edition torrent.
In practice, weâre still dealing with open-loop drivers, meaning that the motor driver does not know the exact angular position of the motor shaft, and it wonât correct deviations. Friction, the motorâs own detent torque and most strikingly, the external load that acts upon the rotor will go unnoticed by the driver. Without closing the loop through an encoder and a more sophisticated special driver, the best we can assume is that the motor will be somewhere ± 2 full-steps (yes, that bad) near its target position, which is the maximum deflection before the rotor snaps into the wrong full-step position, resulting in step-loss.
The incremental torque from one micro step to another is â governed by merciless trigonometry â only a fraction of the dynamic torque of the motor. To ensure that the motor shaft actually sets within +/- 1 microstep, we need to also reduce the load accordingly. Exceeding this smaller, incremental torque wonât result in step loss, but it will cause the same absolute positioning error of up to ± 2 full-steps. The table below shows the devastating relationship.
Next Step Microstepping Drive Manual
Source: Stepper Motor Technical Note: Microstepping Myths and Realities by Micromo
The good news is, that as long as we use a strong enough motor driver, and if we donât exceed that incremental torque, be it through an external load or the motorâs internal inertia, the only theoretical limit for achieving microstep positioning accuracy are the motorâs internal friction and detent torque. These values depend heavily on the motor type, but are generally rather low (almost negligible) values. For example, the motor used in the following test is specified with a detent torque of 200 g cm. Thatâs merely 5% of itâs 4000 g cm holding torque. According to the above table, this motor should be capable of accurate positioning with a 16 microsteps per full-step driver.
So, does this theory apply? And do all microstep motor drivers deliver the same performance in terms of microstep positioning accuracy? I recently had the chance to test a few motor drivers for a project, and I was rather surprised by the results.
Test Setup
For the test setup, I borrowed the red laser pointer from my IR thermometer and attached it to the motor through a 3D printed fixture. A 3D printed mirror mount attaches a first surface mirror to the motorâs shaft and features two levers with a length of 100 mm each for loading the motor with a given mass. For the load test, I attached a mass of 100 g to one lever, which results in a load momentum of 1000 g cm through the lever. Thatâs a quarter of the holding torque of the motor used for this test: A Wantai 42BYGHW609 with 1.7 A per phase, 4000 g cm holding torque and 200 steps per revolution.
Unloaded test setup, vapor for awesome laser effects.
I mounted the motor assembly to a rigid windowsill and positioned it so the laser pointer dot is projected across the room onto a pocket rule attached to the opposite wall, about 6 meters away. The optical lever magnifies the steps for accurate readings. Initially, I planned to just note down the readings manually, but then quickly realized that writing a little Java image processing script to extract the readings from photographs could be done in a fraction of the time. So a DSLR camera was hooked up to my test electronics â an Arduino and a RAMPS 1.4 â to be triggered for acquiring the position readings. I certainly shouldâve pointed the laser at the clean, white wall next to the ruler, but a simple threshold on the red-channel did a good job in accurately extracting the bright red laser spot from the ruler. From the reading on the ruler and the distance on the wall, I later calculated the angular position of the motor shaft.
The angular motor position is obtained by arctan(dy/dx)/2
All stepper motor drivers were tested in their 16 microstep per full-step mode. Before the measurement, the stepper motor was brought into a full-step detent position, and the mirror was aligned to a beam perpendicular to the wall. Then 16 microsteps were executed in one direction while triggering the camera after every step. After that, 16 microsteps were executed in the reverse direction, bringing the stepper motor back to its original position. Cow and chicken. Again, the camera was triggered after each step. Measuring the position in both directions should allow me to get an idea of the motorâs cushioned backlash (if present), but resulted in more interesting insights than expected. This test sequence was executed for every driver, both unloaded and loaded with 1000 g cm. The stronger drivers caused a bit of overshoot during the loaded tests, so they were given time to come to rest before a photograph was triggered.
Itâs worth mentioning that all following results originate from the very same motor, and the same physical motor step to ensure comparability. Nothing has been averaged or otherwise processed, except from calculating the shaft position angle. However, all tests have been performed multiple times on different hardware (i.e. the same driver IC, but different breakout boards from different sources) to ensure sanity of the results. Even the quirky results (such as the DRV8825) were reproducible on different setups. Please be aware that the following graphs may give the false impression of a time-continous measurement. They actually show a series of discrete measurements at the marks on the x-axis, and the line graph only should make it easier to see the non-linearities at a glance.
Allegro A4988
The Allegro A4988 on a Pololu-like stepper driver breakout board performed the best, both unloaded and under load. Even though it only delivers 1 A per phase, it achieved very linear, equally spaced microsteps in the unloaded test, with small but reproducible deviations from the ideal position within ± 1 microstep. Interestingly, the A4988 shows its largest deviation at the half-step position.
Unsurprisingly, the shaft position is deflected noticeably under load: more than a half full-step. There goes the dream of infinite resolution. However, the graph also shows that the full-step positions arenât immune to this deflection, even though they are supported by the motorâs slight detent torque.
Texas Instruments DRV8825
The Texas Instruments DRV8825 on a Pololu-like stepper driver breakout board performed the worst. I repeated the measurement several times with different breakout boards from different sources, all of them resulted in curves almost identical to this one. However, since the driver is capable of supplying a higher current of 2.2 A to the motor, it shows a significantly smaller deflection under load at the full-step and half-step positions.
Both loaded and unloaded, the DRV8825 performs well until it reaches the half-step. Then, it leaps almost to the next full-step position within a single microstep. In the reverse direction, it again performs well until it reaches the half-step â this time in the other half of the full-step â before it breaks down to the original full-step position. The behavior is hard to explain. At least deficiencies in the motorâs current sensing path should affect the positioning more uniformly. Iâm sure Hackaday readers can contribute to explaining, confirming, or disproving this behavior of the DRV8825, or maybe point out flaws in the measuring setup that couldâve caused these results.
Toshiba TB6560AHQ
I may admit I did not expect much from the cheap, red ST6560T4 driver board with four Toshiba TB6560AHQ 3A motor driver channels, but itâs a great driver IC and it did perform surprisingly well. The drivers were set to 2.25 A for this test and achieved a good linearity throughout the microstep sequence with a deviation of ± 2 microsteps when unloaded.
![]() Next Step Microstepping Drive Manual
There were, however, reproducible non-linearities at the upper full-step position which the A4988 did not show, and the TB6560AHQâs behavior under load differs noticeably from the idle behavior. Also, itâs surprising that the motor is deflected under the load by more than a half full-step, since the higher current should increase the motor torque similarly to the DRV8825.
Next Step Microstepping Drive TroubleshootingConclusion
I hope this write-up and measurement results help you with your design decisions and when working with these very common drivers. I did this tests for a rather narrow application, and they shouldnât be generalized too much. Although I dare to conclude the following:
Stepper motors in heavier machines, such as CNC routers, that use open-loop microstepping, mostly benefit from the reduced vibrations and the lower torque ripple of microstep mode. They can not rely on microstepping as a means of increased positioning accuracy (at least not without keeping large torque margins), since a load may still deflect the axisâs position by more than a full-step.
However, small and light applications with low load and low friction may indeed resort to microstepping as a cheap trick to squeeze more accuracy out of a standard stepper motor. Even with a cheap, low-current motor driver, looking at the very well performing A4988, accurate angular positioning is possible, as long as the load is kept low, ideally within the incremental torque of a microstep.
Next Step Microstepping Drive
As always, Iâll be glad to hear your thoughts, opinions, and experiences on the subject of this post. Whatâs going on with my DRV8825s? What stepper motor drivers do you rely on most of the time? Let us know in the comments!
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |